Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 48.8 to 30.6.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.7 | 28.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.17 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1107 | — |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1060 | — |
| LMArena French | 1064 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1059 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.