Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 30.4 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 31.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1084 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | 35.4% |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | 45% |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1071 |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1107 |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1039 |
Multilingual Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1052 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1061 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1054 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 988 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1046 |
| LMArena French | — | 1065 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 971 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1049 |
Instruction Following Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1057 |
Long Context Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1056 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1094 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1060 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1040 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.3 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Gemma 1.1 7b IT better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.