Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Granite 4.0 Micro
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 29.5 to 11.2.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 30.7 | 28.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-10-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.017 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.11 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235), Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | — |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217), Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1107 | — |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242), Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 39.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1060 | — |
| LMArena French | 1064 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278), Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | — |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283), Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1059 | — |
| WildBench | — | 67% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Granite 4.0 Micro?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Granite 4.0 Micro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.