Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 30.4 to 23.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 28.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 999 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 976 |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1026 |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 980 |
Multilingual Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1024 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 952 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 978 |
Long Context Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 988 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.