Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Llama 3-70B

Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

30.7

Rank #275 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.5

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3-70B in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 29.5 to 12.0.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Llama 3-70B specifications
Gemma 1.1 7b ITLlama 3-70B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index30.728.5
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1931

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3-70B leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279), Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITLlama 3-70B
LMArena Coding10841206
HumanEval+35.4%72%
MBPP+45%69%
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITLlama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235), Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITLlama 3-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts10711195
Kagi LLM Benchmark—35.1%
DTBench—54.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.91
ForecastBench—57.1
WinoGrande—83.5%

Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217), Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITLlama 3-70B
LMArena Math11071218
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.3%
MATH Level 5—22.6%

Knowledge Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITLlama 3-70B
LMArena Expert10391149
GPQA Diamond—40.6%
MMLU—79.3%

Multilingual Llama 3-70B leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268), Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITLlama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English10521142
LMArena Chinese10601114
LMArena French10641231
LMArena German10541169
LMArena Japanese9711017
LMArena Korean9881017
LMArena Russian10461159
LMArena Spanish10491241

Instruction Following Llama 3-70B leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278), Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITLlama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following10571194

Long Context Llama 3-70B leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITLlama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query10561174

Writing & Preference Llama 3-70B leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283), Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITLlama 3-70B
LMArena Text10941221
LMArena Creative Writing10591210
LMArena Multi-Turn10401223

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Llama 3-70B?

Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Llama 3-70B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper