Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 4 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads 19.6 to 14.2.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 30.7 | 28.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.0 (#279), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1102 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 19.6 (#235), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1100 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 77% |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 29.5 (#217), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1151 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 27.8 (#242), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1067 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 90.7% |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#268), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1060 | 1061 |
| LMArena French | 1064 | 1134 |
| LMArena German | 1054 | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1111 |
Instruction Following Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.3 (#278), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1087 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#267), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1088 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.6 (#283), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1059 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1068 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.0 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.