Model comparison
DBRX vs Qwen Turbo
DBRX is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Databricks
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DBRX scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Turbo in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where DBRX leads 24.3 to 15.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for DBRX and 56.2% for Qwen Turbo.
- DBRX has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DBRX | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-03-27 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
DBRX: 32.9 (#266), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1132 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 70.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
DBRX: 21.4 (#222), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math DBRX leads
DBRX: 24.3 (#269), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 56.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1145 | — |
Knowledge Qwen Turbo leads
DBRX: 14.9 (#294), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 32.9% | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1076 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
DBRX: 29.3 (#268), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1071 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1068 | — |
| LMArena French | 1096 | — |
| LMArena German | 1057 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 990 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 993 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1078 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1064 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DBRX: 57.5 (#270), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1112 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
DBRX: 33.7 (#258), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1112 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
DBRX: 33.6 (#275), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | DBRX | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1119 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1111 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is DBRX better than Qwen Turbo?
DBRX is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do DBRX and Qwen Turbo share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DBRX has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.