Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.3 to 25.3.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1210 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1208 |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1187 |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.