Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 26.8 to 10.7.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Claude 3 SonnetOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index29.032.7
Released2024-02-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding12231210
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11971208
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12131208
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1173—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision984—

Multilingual Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12051160
LMArena Chinese11891192
LMArena Russian12271187
LMArena French1229—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following Claude 3 Sonnet leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11991186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Too close to call

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12111194

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12181218
LMArena Creative Writing11861199
LMArena Multi-Turn12271221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper