Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs MiniMax-M2.1
MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.1 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.5 to 25.3.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 38.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), MiniMax-M2.1: 40.1 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1421 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 27.7 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), MiniMax-M2.1: 15.8 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1410 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
Math MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), MiniMax-M2.1: 35.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1396 |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), MiniMax-M2.1: 37.7 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1432 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), MiniMax-M2.1: 50.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1430 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1380 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1297 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1386 |
| LMArena French | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1396 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), MiniMax-M2.1: 74.0 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1399 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), MiniMax-M2.1: 58.5 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1362 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1396 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than MiniMax-M2.1?
MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and MiniMax-M2.1 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.