Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.2 to 26.0.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 38.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Qwen3.6 Flash: 28.4 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Qwen3.6 Flash: 38.0 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1047 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.2 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | — |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.