Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs MiniMax-M2
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.0 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 37.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-10-27 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |
Math MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1352 |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1337 |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1366 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1331 |
| LMArena French | — | 1335 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1326 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1328 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1331 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1361 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than MiniMax-M2?
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and MiniMax-M2 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.