Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Hunyuan Large Vision

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Google

29.3

Rank #313 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 46.5 to 25.1.
  • Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Hunyuan Large Vision specifications
Gemma 1.1 2b ITHunyuan Large Vision
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index29.337.6
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1613

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding10341308
HumanEval+17.7%—
MBPP+23.3%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts10051257

Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math10471268

Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert9701252

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision—1180

Multilingual Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English9881236
LMArena Chinese10121287
LMArena Russian9901243
LMArena German944—
LMArena Korean899—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following9921251

Long Context Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query10031280

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 2b ITHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text10221263
LMArena Creative Writing9981248
LMArena Multi-Turn9591254

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper