Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 46.5 to 25.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 37.6 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1308 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1257 |
Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1268 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1252 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1243 |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1251 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1280 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1254 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.