Model comparison

MiniMax-M2 vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

36.9

Rank #201 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

28.8

Rank #310 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.3 to 31.3.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
MiniMax-M2Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderMiniMaxMicrosoft
Noometry Index36.928.8
Released2025-10-272024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked2132

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding13701102
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)61%—
LMArena WebDev1297—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Terminal-Bench30%—
Vending-Bench 2160.6—

Reasoning MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13571100
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math13501151
LiveBench Math—17.6%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert13361067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13141058
LMArena Chinese13671061
LMArena French13361134
LMArena German13661080
LMArena Russian13321111
LMArena Spanish13261111
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13291087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13321088

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text13401110
LMArena Creative Writing12881083
LMArena Multi-Turn13621068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2 better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2 or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper