Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 25.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1447 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1478 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1417 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1445 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.