Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 31.3.
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.4 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1102 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 20.3% |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1100 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 15.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 30.3% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 58.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 77% |
| LiveBench | — | 24% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1151 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1479 | 1067 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 90.7% |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 88% |
| TriviaQA | — | 58.1% |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1061 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | 1134 |
| LMArena German | 1417 | 1080 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | 966 |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | 894 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1111 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | 1111 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1444 | 1087 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 47.2% |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1088 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1068 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 12.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.