Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 3 32b Think in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1319 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1302 |
Math Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1316 |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1273 |
Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1275 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.