Model comparison
MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
MiniMax-M2.7 and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.4 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 59.1 to 49.2.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 30 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1318 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 37% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 599.25 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 45.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.3% | — |
| GBAEval | 0% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1302 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 24.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0.6% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 39.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.84 | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1315 |
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1443 | 1272 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | — |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1439 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1422 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1398 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1383 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1275 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1404 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1354 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1413 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
MiniMax-M2.7 and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.4 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.