Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Llama 3.2 1B
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.2 1B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 48.5 to 21.3.
- Llama 3.2 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 1B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 20.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 60K |
| Max output | — | 54K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.027 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1070 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 8.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 11.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10.8% |
| BALROG | — | 6.6% |
Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1044 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 101.99 |
Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1086 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |
Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1007 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 23.9% |
Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 959 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 941 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1031 |
Long Context Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1050 |
Writing & Preference Gemini Advanced 0514 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1055 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1030 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 200 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Llama 3.2 1B?
Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Llama 3.2 1B better for coding?
Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Llama 3.2 1B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 1B has 22.