Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Llama 3.1-8B

Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini Advanced 0514 Google

37.7

Rank #197 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-8B Meta

23.0

Rank #352 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1-8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini Advanced 0514 leads 35.5 to 10.2.
  • Llama 3.1-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-8B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index37.723.0
Released—2024-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked1743

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Llama 3.1-8B: 20.2 (#340)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Coding12551195
SciCode—13.2%
WeirdML—1.7%
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.8%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.5%
HumanEval+—62.8%
MBPP+—55.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Llama 3.1-8B: 22.5 (#131)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—25.8%
BALROG—15.1%

Reasoning Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Llama 3.1-8B: 14.9 (#321)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts12481175
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—50.9%
LMCA—5.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.57
PIQA—81.2%

Math Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Llama 3.1-8B: 10.2 (#317)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Math12721179
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.7%
Omni-MATH—13.7%
MATH Level 5—22.9%
GSM8K—82.4%

Knowledge Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Llama 3.1-8B: 8.0 (#307)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Expert12151144
GPQA Diamond—27%
MMLU-Pro—40.6%
GPQA (HELM)—24.7%
BoolQ—82.8%
MMLU—56.1%

Multilingual Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Llama 3.1-8B: 34.0 (#249)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Non-English12741148
LMArena Chinese12741151
LMArena French13071177
LMArena German12751144
LMArena Japanese12421061
LMArena Korean12321053
LMArena Russian12831158
LMArena Spanish12421169

Instruction Following Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Llama 3.1-8B: 58.9 (#258)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Instruction Following12531159
IFEval—74.3%

Long Context Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Llama 3.1-8B: 35.8 (#238)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Longer Query12531182

Writing & Preference Gemini Advanced 0514 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Llama 3.1-8B: 29.7 (#290)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Text12791187
LMArena Creative Writing12841154
LMArena Multi-Turn12691172
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—713
WildBench—68.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Llama 3.1-8B?

Gemini Advanced 0514 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Llama 3.1-8B better for coding?

Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Llama 3.1-8B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-8B has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper