Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini Advanced 0514 Google

37.7

Rank #197 Confirmed

Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI

47.7

Rank #60 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 57.0 to 35.5.
  • Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini Advanced 0514Kimi K2.6
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index37.747.7
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked1751

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Kimi K2.6
LMArena Coding12551488
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1509
SciCode—53.5%
WeirdML—55.9%
ALE-Bench—1,093

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Kimi K2.6
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
ExploitBench—18.4%
GBAEval—0.9%
GDP.pdf—12%
Vending-Bench 2—6,205

Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Kimi K2.6
LMArena Hard Prompts12481470
NYT Connections (extended)—87.2%
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—26%
EBR-Bench—2.4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—90.9%
LMCA—37.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.05

Math Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Kimi K2.6
LMArena Math12721475
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—25.6%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—72.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—96.1%
ProofBench—16%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Kimi K2.6
LMArena Expert12151491
GPQA Diamond—90.8%
SimpleQA Verified—34.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini Advanced 0514: —, Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Kimi K2.6
LMArena Vision—1283
Blueprint-Bench 2—3.9%
Furniture Assembly—21.7%
LMArena Document—1451

Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Kimi K2.6
LMArena Non-English12741446
LMArena Chinese12741521
LMArena French13071471
LMArena German12751450
LMArena Japanese12421443
LMArena Korean12321427
LMArena Russian12831446
LMArena Spanish12421464

Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Kimi K2.6
LMArena Instruction Following12531451

Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Kimi K2.6
LMArena Longer Query12531468

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26)

BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514Kimi K2.6
LMArena Text12791455
LMArena Creative Writing12841434
LMArena Multi-Turn12691453
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1725
EQ-Bench 4—1202

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Kimi K2.6 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper