Model comparison

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 xAI

37.7

Rank #198 Confirmed

Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI

47.7

Rank #60 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 57.0 to 35.4.
  • Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Kimi K2.6 specifications
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Kimi K2.6
ProviderxAIMoonshot AI
Noometry Index37.747.7
Released2024-08-132026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked1751

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.6 leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Kimi K2.6
LMArena Coding12691488
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1509
SciCode—53.5%
WeirdML—55.9%
ALE-Bench—1,093

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —, Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Kimi K2.6
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
ExploitBench—18.4%
GBAEval—0.9%
GDP.pdf—12%
Vending-Bench 2—6,205

Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Kimi K2.6
LMArena Hard Prompts12551470
NYT Connections (extended)—87.2%
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—26%
EBR-Bench—2.4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—90.9%
LMCA—37.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.05

Math Kimi K2.6 leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41)

Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Kimi K2.6
LMArena Expert12381491
GPQA Diamond—90.8%
SimpleQA Verified—34.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —, Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Kimi K2.6
LMArena Vision—1283
Blueprint-Bench 2—3.9%
Furniture Assembly—21.7%
LMArena Document—1451

Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Kimi K2.6
LMArena Non-English12571446
LMArena Chinese12621521
LMArena French12861471
LMArena German12731450
LMArena Japanese12131443
LMArena Korean11951427
LMArena Russian12611446
LMArena Spanish12791464

Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Kimi K2.6
LMArena Instruction Following12451451

Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Kimi K2.6
LMArena Longer Query12661468

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Kimi K2.6
LMArena Text12811455
LMArena Creative Writing12421434
LMArena Multi-Turn12651453
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1725
EQ-Bench 4—1202

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Kimi K2.6 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper