Model comparison

Gemini Advanced 0514 vs GLM-5.1

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini Advanced 0514 Google

37.7

Rank #197 Confirmed

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.8

Rank #59 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.1 leads 54.9 to 33.3.
  • GLM-5.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini Advanced 0514 and GLM-5.1 specifications
Gemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.1
ProviderGoogleZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index37.747.8
Released—2026-04-07
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked1741

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.1
LMArena Coding12551485
SWE-bench Verified—74.2%
LMArena WebDev—1508
SciCode—43.8%
WeirdML—57.1%
ALE-Bench—887.1

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini Advanced 0514: —, GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.1
APEX-Agents—40.9%
ExploitBench—18.1%
GBAEval—0%
Vending-Bench 2—5,634

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.1
LMArena Hard Prompts12481472
SimpleBench—55.1%
NYT Connections (extended)—77.7%
CritPt—4.6%
Chess Puzzles—19%
Thematic Generalization—69.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.84

Math GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.1
LMArena Math12721473
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—36.8%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—67.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
ProofBench—22.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—33.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—12.5%

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.1
LMArena Expert12151476
GPQA Diamond—89.9%
SimpleQA Verified—34%

Multilingual GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.1
LMArena Non-English12741447
LMArena Chinese12741515
LMArena French13071474
LMArena German12751465
LMArena Japanese12421434
LMArena Korean12321418
LMArena Russian12831454
LMArena Spanish12421469

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.1
LMArena Instruction Following12531451

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.1
LMArena Longer Query12531466

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini Advanced 0514GLM-5.1
LMArena Text12791461
LMArena Creative Writing12841453
LMArena Multi-Turn12691472
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1592

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or GLM-5.1 better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and GLM-5.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.1 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper