Model comparison
Gemini 4 Argon vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 45.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 40.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 99% for Gemini 4 Argon and 22% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 56.5 | 45.2 |
| Released | 2026-09-30 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1678 | 1479 |
| SciCode | 61.8% | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1550 | 1503 |
| FrontierSWE | 55% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 82.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 13,718 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 27.1% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1548 | 1488 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 99% | 22% |
| LMArena Math | 1536 | 1481 |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1553 | 1503 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 54.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1523 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1610 | 1507 |
| LMArena Russian | 1537 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1497 | 1471 |
| LMArena French | — | 1488 |
| LMArena German | — | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1437 |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1538 | 1477 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1549 | 1483 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads
Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1534 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1531 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1557 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 4 Argon better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 45.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 4 Argon or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 47.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.