Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 4 Argon Google

56.5

Rank #24 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 4 Argon scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 1 category; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 49.2 to 21.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 27.1% for Gemini 4 Argon and 9.1% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

Gemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index56.545.3
Released2026-09-302026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked2132

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Plus
SciCode61.8%45.5%
LMArena Coding15501473
FrontierCode—10.2%
LMArena WebDev1678—
FrontierSWE55%—

Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Plus
APEX-Agents82.2%—
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
Vending-Bench 213,718—

Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Plus
CritPt27.1%9.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts15481460
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.37

Math Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Math15361466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Expert15531467
GPQA Diamond—87.9%

Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
Blueprint-Bench 254.4%—
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English15231445
LMArena Chinese16101510
LMArena Russian15371457
LMArena Spanish14971457
LMArena French—1473
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1413
LMArena Korean—1415

Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following15381440

Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query15491455

Writing & Preference Gemini 4 Argon leads

Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text15341455
LMArena Creative Writing15311439
LMArena Multi-Turn15571460

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 4 Argon better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 4 Argon has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper