Model comparison
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs QwQ-32B
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 7 categories and QwQ-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 49.2 to 23.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 95.6% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview and 59.2% for QwQ-32B.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-17 | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 59 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 50.9 (#42), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1460 | 1333 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.4% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 72.7% | — |
| GSO | 9.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 61.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,367 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.7 (#29), QwQ-32B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 64.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 82.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 27.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 76.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91.2% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 49.8% | — |
| BALROG | 48.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1198 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,635 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#37), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1465 | 1325 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.8 | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | 58.5 | 58.3 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 33.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 83.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 26% | — |
| DTBench | 89.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| LMCA | 43.1% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.7 (#55), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | 59.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1473 | 1359 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 15% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 35.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#33), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 89.4% | 65.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1462 | 1324 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.8% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.5 (#16), QwQ-32B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1285 | — |
| GeoBench | 88% | — |
| VPCT | 72.6% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1413 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.7 (#27), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1458 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1477 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1489 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1443 | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1469 | 1354 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.7 (#56), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#67), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1452 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.5 (#45), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1466 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1457 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than QwQ-32B?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or QwQ-32B better for coding?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.9 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and QwQ-32B share?
22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.