Model comparison
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs GLM-4.5V
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher in 9 categories and GLM-4.5V in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads 49.2 to 26.5.
- GLM-4.5V is cheaper at $0.60 / $1.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 64K.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GLM-4.5V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2025-12-17 | 2025-08-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 64K |
| Max output | 66K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | $1.80 |
| Results tracked | 59 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.5 (#35), GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1460 | 1347 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.4% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1439 | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 72.7% | — |
| GSO | 9.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 61.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,367 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.6 (#27), GLM-4.5V: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 64.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 82.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 27.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 76.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 91.2% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 49.8% | — |
| BALROG | 48.1% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1198 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,635 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#35), GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1465 | 1335 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 33.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 83.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 40% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 26% | — |
| DTBench | 89.1% | — |
| LMCA | 43.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 151.83 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.5 | — |
Math Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.4 (#42), GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1472 | 1353 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 51.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 67.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 15% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 35.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#30), GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | 1353 |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 66.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 13.5% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.3 (#15), GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1285 | 1154 |
| GeoBench | 88% | — |
| VPCT | 72.6% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1413 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.9 (#26), GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1458 | 1304 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1510 | 1338 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1299 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | 1335 |
| LMArena French | 1478 | — |
| LMArena German | 1497 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1488 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1443 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.8 (#52), GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1311 |
Long Context Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#63), GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1452 | 1305 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3 Flash Preview leads
Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.6 (#44), GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3 Flash Preview | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1466 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1457 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1333 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview better than GLM-4.5V?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash Preview or GLM-4.5V?
GLM-4.5V is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $1.80 per million output tokens; Gemini 3 Flash Preview lists at $0.50 and $3.
Is Gemini 3 Flash Preview or GLM-4.5V better for coding?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.5 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 64K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3 Flash Preview and GLM-4.5V share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.