Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen1.5-110B

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Google

54.1

Rank #29 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.6

Rank #231 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 62.7 to 21.7.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 FlashQwen1.5-110B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.133.6
Released2026-05-192024-04-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$9—
Results tracked5420

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 49.1 (#46), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding14921184
SWE-bench Verified79.3%—
DeepSWE37.4%—
LMArena WebDev1499—
SciCode53.1%—
WeirdML62.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%
ALE-Bench911.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 24.8 (#107), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen1.5-110B
APEX-Agents27.5%—
GBAEval6.7%—
GDP.pdf14%—
Vending-Bench 25,396—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 62.7 (#16), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts14881168
ForecastBench5957.7
ARC-AGI-272.1%—
SimpleBench76.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.6%—
ARC-AGI-192.5%—
CritPt13.1%—
Chess Puzzles50%—
EnigmaEval25.4%—
EBR-Bench4.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles32%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA47.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench58.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.55—

Math Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 60.5 (#30), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math15021185
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)62.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
ProofBench31%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 66.3 (#10), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert14931144
GPQA Diamond92.8%—
SimpleQA Verified66.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.7 (#13), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Vision1311—
Blueprint-Bench 233.6%—
LMArena Document1463—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 57.1 (#12), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English14751142
LMArena Chinese15251206
LMArena French14901150
LMArena German15001123
LMArena Japanese14811074
LMArena Korean14531044
LMArena Russian14911118
LMArena Spanish14781141

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 77.2 (#29), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following14661158

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 45.3 (#39), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query14811157

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 65.5 (#46), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text14811175
LMArena Creative Writing14671148
LMArena Multi-Turn14821160
EQ-Bench 41087—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Gemini 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.1 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.1 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Qwen1.5-110B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper