Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Wizardlm 70b

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.5

Rank #133 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.2 to 34.8.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.533.0
Released2026-07-21—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked3912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14531081
LMArena WebDev1440—
SciCode41.3%—
WeirdML39%—
ALE-Bench765.27—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
APEX-Agents29.3%—
GDP.pdf10%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts14411079
ARC-AGI-210.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)60.4%—
ARC-AGI-153.5%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles22%—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench83.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.13—

Math Wizardlm 70b leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14331116
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench13%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond83.3%—
LMArena Expert1435—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Wizardlm 70b: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1268—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14271078
LMArena Chinese14691052
LMArena German14541083
LMArena Russian14431155
LMArena French1451—
LMArena Japanese1427—
LMArena Korean1407—
LMArena Spanish1442—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14201093

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14351097

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14351120
LMArena Creative Writing14201149
LMArena Multi-Turn14451108
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Wizardlm 70b?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper