Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Wizardlm 70b
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.4 to 34.8.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1081 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1079 |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1093 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Wizardlm 70b?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Grok 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.7 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.