Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 39.1 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 60.4% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 12.9% for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper at $0.30 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 40.2 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1264 |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1461 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Mistral Medium 3.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | 12.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 141.35 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1431 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1432 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | 1223 |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1442 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1415 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.