Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Muse Glimmer

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Muse Glimmer in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 25.7 to 17.3.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.5 and Muse Glimmer specifications
Mistral Medium 3.5Muse Glimmer
ProviderMistral AIMeta
Noometry Index40.241.7
Released—2026-08-10
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output210K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked2215

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Glimmer leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena WebDev12641355
LMArena Coding14611416
SciCode—44.9%

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Hard Prompts14361396
Kagi LLM Benchmark41.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)12.9%—
CritPt—2.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index141.35—

Math Too close to call

Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Math14311417

Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Expert14321386

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65), Muse Glimmer: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Vision1223—

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English14041384
LMArena Chinese14421412
LMArena Russian13951390
LMArena French1448—
LMArena German1451—
LMArena Korean1385—
LMArena Spanish1409—

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following14151375

Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query14151382

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Muse Glimmer
LMArena Text14211389
LMArena Creative Writing13741339
LMArena Multi-Turn14231399
EQ-Bench 4993—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Muse Glimmer share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper