Model comparison

Grok 4.1 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.1 xAI

41.5

Rank #134 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 leads 29.5 to 17.3.
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Grok 4.1Mistral Medium 3.5
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Noometry Index41.540.2
Released2025-11-17—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1922

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena WebDev12141264
LMArena Coding14451461

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Mistral Medium 3.5: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Mistral Medium 3.5
Cybench39%—

Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14351436
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.35

Math Too close to call

Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math14221431

Knowledge Too close to call

Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert14171432

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.1: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1223

Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English14251404
LMArena Chinese14651442
LMArena French14481448
LMArena German14461451
LMArena Korean14071385
LMArena Russian14341395
LMArena Spanish14381409
LMArena Japanese1397—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following14001415

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query14161415

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text14371421
LMArena Creative Writing14111374
LMArena Multi-Turn14371423
EQ-Bench 4—993

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.1 better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.1 or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper