Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Large 3
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Large 3 costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Large 3 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.1 to 36.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 60.4% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 7.5% for Mistral Large 3.
- Mistral Large 3 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.75 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Mistral Large 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Large 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.75 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Mistral Large 3: 34.4 (#237)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | 1230 |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | 1448 |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Mistral Large 3: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Mistral Large 3: 15.2 (#319)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | 7.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1429 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 50.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 23% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |
Math Mistral Large 3 leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Mistral Large 3: 38.7 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1433 | 1414 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Mistral Large 3: 36.0 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | 1421 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 14.5% |
Multimodal Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Mistral Large 3: 38.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | 1221 |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Mistral Large 3: 52.5 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | 1413 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | 1447 |
| LMArena French | 1451 | 1455 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1437 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | 1394 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1384 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1411 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | 1440 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Mistral Large 3: 74.0 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1403 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Mistral Large 3: 43.1 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1413 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Mistral Large 3: 60.0 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | 1386 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 1412 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1429 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Mistral Large 3?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Large 3 costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Large 3?
Mistral Large 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Large 3 share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 3 has 24.