Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs GLM-4.5-Air
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.5-Air costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and GLM-4.5-Air in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.0 to 34.6.
- GLM-4.5-Air is cheaper at $0.20 / $1.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- GLM-4.5-Air has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2025-07-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 66K | 98K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $1.10 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96), GLM-4.5-Air: 34.5 (#225)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1397 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| GSO | — | 2.9% |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82), GLM-4.5-Air: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95), GLM-4.5-Air: 23.3 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | 1379 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.12 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.2 |
Math GLM-4.5-Air leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245), GLM-4.5-Air: 33.8 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1431 | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66), GLM-4.5-Air: 34.6 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1430 | 1370 |
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 76.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 59.4% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38), GLM-4.5-Air: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59), GLM-4.5-Air: 49.4 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1428 | 1366 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | 1452 | 1399 |
| LMArena German | 1454 | 1376 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | 1348 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1440 | 1385 |
Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77), GLM-4.5-Air: 69.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1353 |
| IFEval | — | 81.2% |
Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80), GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1367 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55), GLM-4.5-Air: 56.1 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1419 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1371 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| WildBench | — | 78.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than GLM-4.5-Air?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.5-Air costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.5-Air?
GLM-4.5-Air is cheaper. It lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or GLM-4.5-Air better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and GLM-4.5-Air share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.