Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Grok 4.1
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.1 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.4 to 50.1.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 41.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1445 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1435 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1422 |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1417 |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1438 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1400 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1437 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Grok 4.1?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok 4.1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.