Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Step 3.7 Flash
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 2 categories and Step 3.7 Flash in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 60.4% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 39.7% for Step 3.7 Flash.
- Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
- Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 256K |
| Max output | 66K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 41.3% | 40% |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | 694.12 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | 39.7% |
| CritPt | 0% | 2.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| DTBench | 83.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | — |
| LMArena French | 1451 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Step 3.7 Flash?
Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Step 3.7 Flash share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.