Model comparison

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Palm 2

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.8

Rank #144 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 60.9 to 25.6.

Side by side

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Palm 2 specifications
Gemini 3.1 Flash LitePalm 2
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index40.830.0
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.25—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked3810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Coding1400994
LMArena WebDev1256—
SciCode41.9%—
WeirdML52.2%—
ALE-Bench797.73—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79), Palm 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePalm 2
DeepResearch Bench37.3%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts14071005
Kagi LLM Benchmark67.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)8.2%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
EnigmaEval3%—
Thematic Generalization63.3%—
DTBench76.8%—
LMCA35%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.47—
ForecastBench54.4—

Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Math14281049
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)27.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202580%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePalm 2
GPQA Diamond81.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam8.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate8.2%—
LMArena Expert1398—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60), Palm 2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Vision1240—

Multilingual Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Non-English1411916
LMArena Chinese1461887
LMArena French1424—
LMArena German1429—
LMArena Japanese1413—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Russian1420—
LMArena Spanish1421—

Instruction Following Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Instruction Following13771010

Long Context Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Longer Query13941010

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Flash LitePalm 2
LMArena Text14161027
LMArena Creative Writing1401991
LMArena Multi-Turn1417994

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than Palm 2?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Palm 2 better for coding?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.8 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper