Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Palm 2

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.1 Anthropic

41.0

Rank #142 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 6 categories and Palm 2 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Opus 4.1 leads 62.4 to 25.6.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.1 and Palm 2 specifications
Claude Opus 4.1Palm 2
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index41.030.0
Released2025-08-05—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$15—
Output $ / M tokens$75—
Results tracked4810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Palm 2
LMArena Coding1479994
SWE-bench Verified73.3%—
LMArena WebDev1390—
WeirdML45.9%—
ALE-Bench674.77—
AlgoTune1.34—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41), Palm 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Palm 2
Terminal-Bench38%—
GDPval43.6%—
Cybench42%—
DeepResearch Bench48.3%—
LMArena Search1148—
METR Time Horizons66.8%—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Palm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts14431005
SimpleBench60%—
Chess Puzzles7%—
EnigmaEval7.2%—
EBR-Bench7.9%—
Mystery Game Puzzles21%—
DTBench80%—
LMCA37.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.12—
ForecastBench62—

Math Palm 2 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Palm 2
LMArena Math14311049
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)12.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202568.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)7.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Palm 2
GPQA Diamond77.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam11.5%—
Confabulations17.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—
LMArena Expert1439—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119), Palm 2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Palm 2
VPCT35%—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Palm 2
LMArena Non-English1405916
LMArena Chinese1427887
LMArena French1431—
LMArena German1413—
LMArena Japanese1378—
LMArena Korean1380—
LMArena Russian1422—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Palm 2
LMArena Instruction Following14351010

Long Context Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Palm 2
LMArena Longer Query14551010

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Palm 2
LMArena Text14191027
LMArena Creative Writing1412991
LMArena Multi-Turn1444994
Short-Story Creative Writing84.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Palm 2?

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Palm 2 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.4 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper