Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemma 7B
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 63.7 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2025-03-25 | 2024-02-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 78 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.4 (#101), Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1452 | 1048 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 53.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 83.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1227 | — |
| SciCode | 42.8% | — |
| GSO | 3.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 54% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 85.9% | — |
| CadEval | 64% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.52 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.51 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.2 (#88), Gemma 7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 32.6% | — |
| GDPval | 23.3% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 0.8% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 30.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 13.7% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 42.8% | — |
| BALROG | 43.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1142 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 55.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 573.64 | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#99), Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1455 | 1042 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.32 | 111.99 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 62.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 41% | — |
| CritPt | 2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 5.6% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.8% | — |
| DTBench | 82.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 79.9% | — |
| LMCA | 34.8% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| ForecastBench | 61.3 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| LiveBench | 82.3% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |
Math Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 32.5 (#213), Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1066 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 24.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 41.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 90.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 95.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 14.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 56.0 (#46), Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1001 |
| GPQA Diamond | 85.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 86.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 74.9% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 45.2 (#18), Gemma 7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |
| GeoBench | 86% | — |
| VPCT | 48% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1421 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 44.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.3 (#31), Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1451 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1472 | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | 1461 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1487 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.0 (#75), Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1437 | 1017 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.6% | — |
| IFEval | 84% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.8 (#5), Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1449 | 1022 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 91.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.7 (#62), Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1454 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1453 | 963 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1421 | — |
| WildBench | 85.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 67.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro better than Gemma 7B?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemma 7B better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemma 7B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.