Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Hy4 preview
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 28.7.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Hy4 preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 44.6 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | 2026-08-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 64K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.83 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy4 preview leads
Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290), Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1633 |
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247), Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.74 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Hy4 preview leads
Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225), Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 75% |
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1002 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | — |
| LMArena French | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297), Hy4 preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Hy4 preview?
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or Hy4 preview better for coding?
Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Hy4 preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.