Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Longcat Flash Chat
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 43.5 to 35.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 56.8% for Gemini 2.5 Flash and 43.9% for Longcat Flash Chat.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | |
| Noometry Index | 39.3 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-04-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | 1471 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74), Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | 43.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1440 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.03 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1415 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | 1454 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32), Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1253 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1418 | 1408 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1445 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1411 |
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1425 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1418 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Longcat Flash Chat?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Longcat Flash Chat share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.