Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 4 categories and Solar Pro4 in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 18.1.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 2.5 Flash.
- Gemini 2.5 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 524K.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Upstage | |
| Noometry Index | 39.3 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-04-17 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 524K |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | 1437 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.03 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1415 | 1416 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | 1427 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1253 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1418 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1377 |
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1381 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1385 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 39.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 2.5 Flash or Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Gemini 2.5 Flash lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 2.5 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.