Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.2 to 50.4.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | 1346 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1322 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1305 |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | 1307 |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1457 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1409 | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | 1372 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | — |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1298 |
Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Longcat Flash Chat or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.