Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
Gemini 2.5 Flash and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.3 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 2.5 Flash leads 52.3 to 42.0.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 39.3 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2025-04-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 35.8 (#220), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1424 | 1307 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 28.7% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 55.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 41.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 661.88 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 30.8 (#74), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 17.1% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | — |
| BALROG | 33.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 548.84 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 18.1 (#286), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1286 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 2.5% | — |
| SimpleBench | 41.2% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 56.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 33.3% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 2.7% | — |
| DTBench | 76.5% | — |
| LMCA | 27.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.03 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.6 | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 39.9 (#98), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1415 | 1281 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 38.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 36.4 (#168), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1426 | 1276 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 12.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 63.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 16.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 41.8 (#32), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1253 | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| VPCT | 46.2% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 36.9% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 52.3 (#88), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1415 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | — |
| LMArena German | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1385 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1421 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 75.7 (#54), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1405 | 1277 |
| IFEval | 89.8% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 47.5 (#17), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1341 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash: 53.8 (#157), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1408 | 1284 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1137 | — |
| WildBench | 81.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
Gemini 2.5 Flash and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.3 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash has 54 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.