Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Granite 4.2 3b and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.0 vs 38.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.0

Rank #163 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.0

Rank #183 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
Granite 4.2 3bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderIBMTencent
Noometry Index39.038.0
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding13631307

Reasoning Too close to call

Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts13081286

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math—1281

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert13131276

Multilingual Too close to call

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English12681265
LMArena Chinese12681346
LMArena Russian12491266

Instruction Following Too close to call

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following12711277

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query12931342

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text12951288
LMArena Creative Writing12151264
LMArena Multi-Turn12931284

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Granite 4.2 3b and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.0 vs 38.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper