Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.0 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 7 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.0 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1346 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1322 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1305 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1307 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1298 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1342 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.0 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.