Model comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 49.3 to 38.1.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2025-06-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 33 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1373 | 1291 |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 325.9 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 36.9% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1377 | 1272 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.5% | — |
| DTBench | 62.8% | — |
| LMCA | 18.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.94 | — |
Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1373 | 1305 |
| Omni-MATH | 48% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1373 | 1295 |
| MMLU-Pro | 53.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1198 | — |
| VPCT | 30% | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1369 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1404 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1388 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1389 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1396 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1367 | 1247 |
| IFEval | 81% | — |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1272 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 47.2% | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1379 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1367 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1366 | 1252 |
| WildBench | 81.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.0 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.5 vs 37.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.