Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Think vs Yi-Lightning
Olmo 3.1 32b Think and Yi-Lightning score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher in 3 categories and Yi-Lightning in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 37.7 to 27.4.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Yi-Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 37.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1291 | 1312 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 12.9% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | 1302 |
Math Too close to call
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1300 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1286 |
Multilingual Yi-Lightning leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1209 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1320 |
| LMArena French | 1260 | 1305 |
| LMArena German | 1262 | 1267 |
| LMArena Russian | 1193 | 1255 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1289 | 1315 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1228 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1192 |
Instruction Following Yi-Lightning leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1247 | 1278 |
Long Context Too close to call
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1272 | 1297 |
Writing & Preference Yi-Lightning leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1272 | 1302 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1226 | 1280 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1252 | 1311 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think better than Yi-Lightning?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think and Yi-Lightning score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think or Yi-Lightning better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Think and Yi-Lightning share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.