Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google

37.0

Rank #211 Confirmed

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 42.9 to 33.3.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index37.043.1
Released2025-06-17—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked339

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Coding13731418
WeirdML35.2%—
ALE-Bench325.9—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard36.9%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts13771416
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%—
DTBench62.8%—
LMCA18.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.94—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
Omni-MATH48%—
LMArena Math1373—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
MMLU-Pro53.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.3%—
GPQA (HELM)30.9%—
LMArena Expert1373—

Multimodal Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Vision11981180
VPCT30%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Non-English13691382
LMArena Chinese1404—
LMArena French1388—
LMArena German1389—
LMArena Japanese1359—
LMArena Korean1360—
LMArena Russian1373—
LMArena Spanish1396—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Instruction Following13671397
IFEval81%—

Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Longer Query13731404
Fiction.LiveBench47.2%—

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Text13791405
LMArena Creative Writing13671388
LMArena Multi-Turn13661422
WildBench81.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper